 |
pavedwave longboarding
distance longboarding, flatland pumping, cross-country adventuring, boardwalk cruising, and all things skateboarding and good times
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
RiPPer
Joined: 13 Feb 2009
Posts: 53
|
 Posted: Sat May 23, 2009 9:11 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| LDPanda wrote: | | I noticed that stoked lists the matching seismic rears for the bennett 5.0 and 6.0 (130mm and 155mm respectively) but doesnt list the ST105mm despite the fact that the 4.3 is one of the front options for the mermaid complete. Is this mere oversight or do you seismic users tend to pair the 4.3 with a 130 instead? |
They don't list a tracker 106 either, which presumably would be the tracker match for a 4.3 bennett. I guess you could run the 130 with a 4.3.....but still I think the 105 seismic and 106 tracker should be options on the menu.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pavedwave
Joined: 22 Oct 2007
Posts: 1120
Location: seattle wa usa
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 1:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| RiPPer wrote: | | Mermaid V 2.0? More details please..... |
Just finished and handed off the '09 template to Gareth this morning. This design will offer another option in the LDP arsenal, the stance is pulled back a little, giving more power to the rear drive... think Turbo Boost on the long flat stretches. Hopefully a quick turnaround into testing!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pavedwave
Joined: 22 Oct 2007
Posts: 1120
Location: seattle wa usa
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 4:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Should be getting a proto soon... here's an early sketch of the difference in stance:
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Join! (free) 
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
